Effect of Seedbed Preparation Time and Plant Density on the Weed Population of Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Abstract

For investigation of the effects of seedbed preparation time and plant density of sugar beet on the weed population and quality and quantity characteristics of sugar beet, an experiment was conducted as strip plot design with four replications in the field of Islamic Azad University of Karaj (2007-2008).  The first factor included two types of seedbed preparation time (spring and autumn), the second factor included four plant densities of sugar beet (65, 73, 81 and 99 thousand plants per hectare).  Seedbed preparation methods were considered as a randomized complete block design and plant density levels as the Latin square design.  The result of analysis of variance for the traits related to weeds showed that the effect of seedbed preparation method was significant on number of weed species and weed dry weight.  The results of mean comparison showed that the number of weed species and weed dry weight of spring seedbed preparation method was 2-3 times grater than autumn seedbed preparation method.  Increasing plant density of sugar beet from 65 to 99 thousand plants per hectare reduced significantly the number and weed dry weight of weed species.  The results of yield and quality of sugar beet showed that seedbed preparation in autumn, increased root yield (48.18 t. ha-1) by 21 percent, sugar yield (8.3 t. ha-1) by 26 percent and white sugar yield (6.7 t. ha-1) by 24 percent compared to spring time seedbed preparation.  Maximum yield of sugar beet was obtained in plant density of about 100,000 plants per hectare.  In conclusion, seedbed preparation in autumn and drilling sugar beet seed in the early spring with 100 thousand plants per hectare may consider as a compilation method to suppress weed populations and increase sugar beet yield

Keywords


Abdollahian-Noghabi, M. 1992. Study of changes of quantity and quality traits of sugar beet under various sowing dates and harvesting times. M. Sc. Thesis, Tarbiat Modarres University.
Alizadeh, H. M., Preston, C., Powels, S. B. 1999. Paraquqt Resistant Biotypes of Hordeum Glaucum from Zero_ Tillage Wheat. Weed Res. 38: 139-142.
Dawson, J .H. 1965. Competition of late emerging weeds with sugar beet. Weed sci. 25: 1-15.
Fadaei-Shahri, M. R., Najafi, H., Abdollahian-Noghabi, M. Mirhadi, M. J. 2010. Effect of winter cereal cover crop mulches and preparation time on sugar beet yield and dry matter weeds. Proceedings of the 3rd Iranian Weed Science Congress, 17 & 18 February, Babolsar. 213-215.
Fortune, R. A., Burke, J. I., Kennedy, T. O., Sullivan, E. 1999. Effect of early sowing on the growth, yield and quality of sugar beet. Weed science. 50: 12-30.
Kkoocheki, A. 1995. Farming in arid area. Fifth edition, Jihad-e-daneshgahi of Mashhad Press.
Kropff, M. J., Joije, W. 1987. Competition between a sugar beet and population of Chenopodium album L. and Stellaria media L. Netherlands Agriculture science. 35: 525 -528.
Leilah, A. A., Badawi, M. A., Said, E. M., Ghonema, M. H. and Abdou, M. A. E. 2005. Effect of Planting Dates, Plant Population and Nitrogen Fertilization on Sugar Beet Productivity under the Newly Reclaimed Sandy Soils in Egypt. Scientific Journal of King Faisal University .Basic and Applied Sci.6 (1):95-109
Longden, P. C. 1989. Effects of increasing weed – Beet Density on Sugar Beet yield and quality. Applied Biology. 114: 527- 532.
Mesbah, A., Miller, S. D., Fornstrum, K. J. and Legg, D. E. 1995. Wild mustard (Brassica kaber) and wild oat (Avena fatua) interferences in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Weed Technologhy, 9: 49-52.
Muosavi, M. R. 2001. Management of weeds, Principle and methods. Miad Tehran Press.
Najafi, H. 2007. Non-chemical weed management. Kankash-e-Danesh Publication, Mashhad.
Rahbari, A., Abdollahian-Noghabi, M., Alizadeh, H., Khalghani, J., Rahimian, H. 2007. Effect of integrated weed control on the yield and quality of sugar beet in the method of complete seedbed preparation in autumn. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 38 (1): 15-23. 
Rashed-Mohasel, M. and Shahbazi, H. 1999. Effect of weeds competition on growth and dry matter content in different organs of sugar beet. Scientific and Research of Sugar beet. 15: 84-85.
Shahbazi, H. A., Abdollahian-Noghabi, M. 2000. Critical period of weed competition in sugar beet in Mashhad. Hournal of Sugar Beet, 16 (1): 58-74.
Wilson, R. G., Smith, J. A. and Miller S. D. 2001a. Win Erosion control. In: Sugar beet production guide, (Eds) R. G. Wilson, J. A. Smith and S. D. Miller, pp 37-42. University of Nebraska Publications.
Wilson, R. G., Miller S. D. and Nissen, S. J. 2001b. Weed control. In: Sugar beet production guide, (Eds) R. G. Wilson, J. A. Smith and S. D. Miller, pp 117-130. University of Nebraska Publications.
Wood, P. 1983. Weed science: Principle. Second edition‚ West publishing company.
Zand, A. and Sarami, H. 2002. How does at herbicide. Zanjan University Press.