Physiological Response of Alhagi pseudoalhagi to Root Exhausting Management During Fallow Season

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Abstract

A series of experiments were conducted in Khorasan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center (Mashhad, Iran) to evaluate potential germination ability of detached rhizomatous roots as an index of recovery after mechanical management during 2005-2006. Microscopic cross sections were prepared to study the rhizomatous nature of the roots. Effects of the in situ root detaching were examined. Three depths of plough i.e. 10, 20 and 30cm were applied at a field highly infected with camelthorn (Alhagi pseudoalhagi) during fallow season. Samples were taken to record the number of germinated detached roots 20, 30 and 50 days after treatment. To quantify revival of mechanically treated rhizomes undetached from root bases, further experiments were performed during the fallow season of 2005. Camelthorn was cut off from 4 different soil depth i.e. 0, 10, 20 and 30 cm at an infected field with natural distribution. Date of germination, plant height, canopy shading area, number of shoots and dry matter were recorded at 7, 10,17, 24, 34, 41 and 58 days after treatment (DAT). Various physiological indices including plant growth rate and germination rate were determined. The results revealed that roots with various length of detachment at the field differ significantly in ability to recover. However, no germination in all pot experiments Correspondence to : M.bazoobandi, bazubandi@yahoo.com M.Bazoobandi et al 85 was recorded. Soil depth for cutting off roots could make significant differences on plant growth characteristics. Final shoot height was significantly reduced by depth of cutting. Almost the same pattern was recorded in case of canopy shading area and single plant dry matter. In conclusion, the deeper plow depth the more suppressed plants are, and as a consequence, we have better camelthorn management.

Bazoobandi, M. Faravani, M. and Akhavan, M., 2005. Annual report. Weed research
priorities in Khorasan. Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection,Agricultural
Research and Education organization, Iran.P:2-5
Bottel, A. E., 1933. Introduction and control of camelthorn, Alhagi camelorum (Fisch.).
Monthly Bulletin of the California State Department of Agriculture 22:261-263.
Ghersa, C. M. and Holt, J. S. 1995. Using phenology prediction in weed management: a
review. Weed Research 35: 461–470.
Hatcher, P. E. and Melander, M. 2003. Combining physical, cultural and biological
methods: prospects for integrated non-chemical weed management strategies. Weed
Research 43: 303–322.
Halil, K., Saneoka, H., Nehira, K., Rahmutulla, A., Premachandra, G. S. and Fujita, K.
1999. Effect of salinity on growth, photosynthesis and mineral composition in
leguminous plant Alhagi pseudoalhagi (Bieb.). Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 45:
851-862.
Hickman, J. C. 1993. The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California. UC Press, Berkeley,
CA.
Kassas, M. 1952. On the reproductive capacity and life cycle of Alhagi maurorum. Proc.
Egyptian Acad. Science 8:114-122.
Kerr, H. D., Robocker, W. C. Muzik, T. J. 1965. Characteristics and control of camelthorn.
Weeds 13:156-163.
M.Bazoobandi et al
95
Kluth, S. Kruess, and Tscharntke, T. 2003. Influence of mechanical cutting and pathogen
application on the performance and nutrient storage of Cirsium arvense. Journal of
Applied Ecology 40: 334–343.
Marrs, R. H. Johnson, S. W. and Duc, M. G. 1998. Control of bracken and restoration of
heathland. VII. The response of bracken rhizomes to 18 years of continued bracken
control or 6 years of control followed by recovery. Journal of Applied Ecology. 35:
748-757.
Monier, M. and Abd El-Ghani, 2000. Floristic and environmental relations in two extreme
desert zones of western Egypt. Global Ecology & Biogeography 9: 499-516.
Mortimer, A.M. P. D. Putwine and Macmahon D. J. 1978. A theoretical approach to the
prediction of weed population size. Proc. British Crop Conference-Weeds 467-474.
Parsons, W.T. and Culhbertson, E. G. 1992. Noxious Weeds of Australia. Inkata Press,
Syndey, Australia. pp. 464-466.
Rahimian, H. 1999. Final report. Ecology, Physiology and control of camelthorn. Iranian
Research Institute of Plant Protection.
Rashed, M. H. Najafi, H. and Akbarzadeh, M. 2001. Weed biology and control. Tehran
University. Press. Pp404.
Rask, A. M. and Andreasen, C. 2007. Influence of mechanical rhizome cutting, rhizome
drying and burial at different developmental stages on the regrowth of Calystegi
asepium. Weed Research 47: 84–93.
Richardson, J. M. 1953. Camelthorn Alhagi camelorum (Fisch.) J. Dept. Agr. South
Australia. 57:18-20.
Sazvari, G. R. 2006. Seed Germination characteristics of camelthorn. MSc Thesis. Islamic
Azad University, Mashad, Iran