Evaluation of Basil (Ocimum basilicum) and Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) Intercropping at Different Nitrogen Fertilizer Levels and its Effect on Weed Density

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Abstract

To study the effect of different levels of nitrogen and intercropping systems of basil (Ocimum basiilicum L.) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) on weed population structure, an experiment was carried out as a split-split plot a randomized complete blocks design with three replications during 2010-2011 at Sari Agricultural Science and Natural Resources University. Treatments included weed control and weed infested as the main plots, levels of nitrogen (0, 50 and 100 kg/ha) as sub plots, Sole cropping of cowpea and basil, and additive planting ratios of 25, 50 and 75% basil as sub-sub plots. Under weed control conditions, the highest yield of cowpea (685 kg ha-1) and maximum dry matter yield of basil (430 kg ha-1) were obtained from 50% basil ratio with 50 and 100 kg ha-1N fertilizer application, respectively. The highest yield of basil (139 kg ha-1) was observed in weed infested plots of 25% basil planting ratio and 100 kg ha-1 nitrogen fertilizer with the highest invasive coefficient of 1.66 and competition coefficient of 3.42. The highest land equivalent ratio (1.43) belonged to 50% additive ratio of basil in weed free and the lowest (0.87) belonged to 75% ratio and without nitrogen fertilizer in weed infested condition. Generally, existence of cowpea in additive intercropping reduced the population and biomass of weeds compared to basil sole cropping. Increasing nitrogen fertilizer application caused faster closed canopy of plant species in intercropping which led to reduced weeds population and biomass.

Keywords

References

Anwar, M., Patra, D.D., Chand, S., Alpesh, K., Naqvi, A. A. and  Khanuja, S. 2005. Effects of organic manures and inorganic fertilizer on growth herb and oil yield, nutrient accumulation and oil quality of Ferench basil. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 36: 1737- 1746.
Alizadeh, Y., Koocheki, A. and Nassiri Mahallati, M. 2010. The study of agronomic characteristics yield, yield components and weed control potential of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and vegetative basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) in intercropping condition. J. of Agroeco 3: 383-397.(In Persian with English summary). 
Banik, P. 1996. Evaluation of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and legume intercropping under 1:1 and 2:1 row replacement series system. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 175: 189–194.
Banik, P., Midya, A., Sarkar, B.K. and Ghose, S.S. 2006. Wheat and chickpea intercropping systems in an additive series experiment: Advantages and weed smothering. Eur. J. Agron. 24: 325–332.
Carruthers, K., Cloutier, D. and Smith, D.L. 1998. Intercropping corn with soybean, lupin and forages: weed control by intercrops combined with inter row cultivation. Eur. J. Agron. 8: 225–238.
Carlson, H.L. and Hill, J.E. 1986. Wild oat (Avena fatua) competition with spring wheat: effects of nitrogen fertilization. Weed Sci. 34: 29-33.
Chaeechi, M.R. and Daryaee, F. 2008. The evaluation of yield sorghum forage and alfalfa in intercropping and its effect on weed population dynamics. Iran.  J. Crop Sci. 39: 137-143. (In Persian with English summary).
Chetty, C.K., Reddy, M.N.1987. Ageneral proposal for ranking intercrop treatments. India. J. Agric. Sci. 57: 64–65.
Dhima, K.V., Lithourgidis, A.A., Vasilakoglou, I.B., and Dordas, C.A. 2007. Competition indices of common vetch and cereal intercropping in two seeding ratio. Field Crops. Res. 100: 249-256.
Evans, S.P., Kenezevic, S.Z., Lindquist, J.L., Shapiro, C.A. and Blankenship, E.E. 2003. Nitrogen application influences the critical period for weed control in corn. Weed Sci. 51: 301-306.
Ghanbari, A., Ghadiri, H., Ghafarimoghadam, M. and Safari, M. 2010. Investigation of corn (Zea mays L.) and squash (Cucurbita sp.) and its effect on weed control. Iran. J. Crop Sci. 41: 43-55. (In Persian with English summary).
Hiebseh, C. K. and Mecollum, R.E. 1987. Area× time equivalency ratio: A method for evaluating the productivity of intercrops. Agron. J. 799: 15-22.
Jamshidi, Kh., Mazaheri, D., Majnoon Hossaini, N., Rahimian Mashhadi., H. and Payghambari, A. 2011. The Effect of maize and cowpea intercropping on weed suppression. Iran J. Crop Sci. 42: 233-241. (In Persian with English summary).
Jeranyama, P. and Harwood., R.R. 2000. Relay intercropping of sun hemp and cowpea into a smalholder maize system in Zimbabwe. Agron. J. 92: 239-244.
Koocheki, A., Shabahang, J., Khoramdel, S., Aminghafuri, A. 2011. The effect of different row intercropping of european borage (Borag officinalis L. (and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Iran J. Agric. Ecol. 4: 1-11. (In Persian with English summary).
Ledgard, S. F. 1991. Transfers of fixed nitrogen from white clover to associated grasses in swards grazed by dairy cows estimated using 15 N methods. Plant & soil Sci. 131: 215-223.
Li, L., Tang, C., Rengel, Z. and Zhang, F.S., 2002. Chickpea facilitates phosphorus uptake by intercropped wheat from an organic phosphorus source. Plant Soil. 248: 297–303.
Peterson, D.E. and Nalewaja, J.D. 1992. Environment influence green foxtail (Setaria viridis) competition with wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol. 6: 607-610.
Poggio, S.L. 2005. Structure of weed communities occurring in monoculture and intercropping of field pea and barley. J. Agric, Eco. Environ. 109: 48–58.
Sanjani. S., Hossaini, M. B., Chaeechi, M. R. and Rezvanibidokhti., Sh. 2009. Evaluation of yield and yield components in additive intercropping of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) on population and weed biomass in full and less irrigation condition. Ecolo. Agric. 3: 25- 35.
Singh, V.P., Chattersee, B.N. and Singh, D.V. 1989. Response of mint specie to nitrogen fertilization. Agric. J. Sci.36: 267- 271.
Tollenaar, M. S., Nissanka, P., Aguilera, A., Weise, S. F. and Swanton, C. J. 1994. Effect of weed interference and soil nitrogen on four maize hybrids. Agron. J. 86: 596-601.
Vaez-Zadeh, A. 1984. Best mixed culture ratio of berseem colver and grasses to produce optimum quantity and quality of forage and LER. Proceedings of 3th Agronomy Congress of Iran. P. 31. Tabriz University, Tabriz. (In Persian with English summary).
Willey, R.W. 1979. Intercropping its importance and research needs. I. Competition and yield advantages. Field Crop Abst. 32: 1–10.
Willey, R.W. and Rao, M.R.,1980. Acompetitive ratio for quantifying competition between intercrops. Expl. Agric. 16: 105–117.
Xu, B., Shan, L., Zhang, S., Deng, X. and Li, F. 2008. Evaluation of switch grass and sainfoin intercropping under 2:1 row-replacement in semiarid region, northwest China. Afri. J. Biotech. 7: 4056-4067.
Yilmaz, S., Atak, M. and Erayman, M. 2008. Identification of advantages of maize-legume intercropping over solitary cropping through competition indices in the East Mediterranean region. Tur. J. Agric. Fore. 32: 111-119
Iranian Journal of Weed Science
Volume 9, Issue 2 - Serial Number 2
January 2014
Pages 187-199

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics